The Constitutional Implications of Fisher and Schuette
2014
Abstract
Using a constitutional lens, our morning panel will unpack the result of Fisher v. Univ. of Texas and discuss the potential outcomes of Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action. Featuring the lead counsel in Schuette and authors of amicus briefs in Fisher, the panel will offer their take on the Court's current jurisprudence on Affirmative Action, as well as how it may change in the near future.
Details
Title
The Constitutional Implications of Fisher and Schuette
Author
Robinson, Professor Russell (Berkeley Law (Moderator))
Banks, Professor Ralph Richard (Stanford Law)
Deo, Professor Meera (Thomas Jefferson School of Law)
Driver, Shanta (National Chair, Coalition To Defend Affirmative Action)
Gans, David (Constitutional Accountability Center)
Menendian, Stephen (Haas Institute For A Fair And Inclusive Society)
Banks, Professor Ralph Richard (Stanford Law)
Deo, Professor Meera (Thomas Jefferson School of Law)
Driver, Shanta (National Chair, Coalition To Defend Affirmative Action)
Gans, David (Constitutional Accountability Center)
Menendian, Stephen (Haas Institute For A Fair And Inclusive Society)
Meeting Name
Warren Room, 2014-03-03T09:30:00-08:00, 2014-03-03T11:00:00-08:00, BJALP's Symposia
Date
2014-03
Content Type
Event
Record Created
2019-11-26
Record ID
1126147
Published in
BJALP's Symposia